Home » Latest Politics » Subsidy protest- The real reason why it was aborted

Subsidy protest- The real reason why it was aborted

Saturday January 21,
2012


Photo: Sun News Publishing
More Stories on This Section

 

The battle over the removal of fuel subsidy, which raged for almost a week
all over the nation may, have come and gone, but the last is definitely yet to
be heard on the intrigues and the behind-the-scene manoeuvres that caused the
organised labour into beating a retreat and acquiescing to the Federal
Government’s position.

Saturday Sun exclusively gathered
that it was largely a case of emotional blackmail and outright threat of labour
leaders by the government.

“At some point in time, the sword of treason
hung delicately over the head of the labour negotiators, and being human, the
self-preservation instinct made them buckle,” said a dependable source, who
attended many of the meetings between both parties.

Another competent
source, who attended the meeting, told Saturday Sun how President Goodluck
Jonathan, at one of the sessions, pointedly accused labour of teeming with
disgruntled politicians and vocal civil society groups to bring down the
government. He also sought to appeal to emotions. The president reportedly
queried the labour team: “What have I done that you want to subvert my
government? Am I the only president that has increased the price of fuel? So,
why is my own case different? What is so different about my own case that you
insist that I must return to N65 a litre? I believe you are not being fair to
me?”

The president was not done. He also told labour that they were all
out to embarrass him because of his perceived weakness. He reportedly said:
“When (General Ibrahim) Babangida increased fuel price, he didn’t revert to the
price before increase; (Chief Olusegun) Obasanjo didn’t revert his price. Every
Nigerian head of state has increased fuel price and labour didn’t say revert to
the price it was or they would ground the nation; so why are you saying I must
revert to N65? Is it because I am simple and you are taking my simplicity for
weakness?”
The labour leaders were reportedly dumbfounded by the president’s
outburst. According to the source, when Jonathan offered N97 and went further to
make a veiled reference to treasonable offences, labour leaders knew they had
lost the steam to soldier on.

“Security agencies had obviously bugged
the lines of the top hierarchy of labour and were monitoring interaction between
the leadership of labour and people. Government provided security report, which
showed that the agenda of some of the organisers of the protest went beyond the
fight over removal of fuel subsidy to an outright call for regime change. That
was the last straw that broke labour’s back,” the source told Saturday
Sun.
Seeing they had lost in their original demand for a reversion to the
pre-January 1, 2012, old pump price, labour leaders then turned round to making
specific demands of the president: The complete cleaning of the petroleum
sector, including the octopus NNPC and drastic cut in the cost of governance,
among others. It is believed that labour’s input actually dictated the contents
of the president’s broadcast offering N97.

 

The Senate pressure
The Senate and its
leadership also put enormous pressures on the labour leadership. Senate
President, David Mark, was the arrowhead of the pressure group. As an
experienced power player, he glided smoothly from government to labour, trying
to ensure a delicate balance. Mark didn’t want government to lose face or for
labour to be humiliated. The compromise N97 new fuel price was largely due to
Mark and Senate’s interventionist role.

 

Governors Forum and others
The Nigeria
Governors’ Forum and two of its prominent leaders, Govs. Chibuike Amaechi and
Adams Oshiomhole, also worked assiduously in brokering a truce in the FG/Labour
spat. As a former labour leader, Oshiomhole is said to have worn two caps and
tried to balance both. While appealing to his colleagues to ‘cool temper,’ he
also sought to convince government why it should concede a reduction from the
increase of over 120 per cent.

 

Labour’s reaction
After the unveiling of new
price regime of N97 a litre, labour appeared to be torn apart, into two groups.
One group thought it was victory for organised labour in that they had secured a
reduction, while forcing presidential commitment to good and responsible
governance.
“What Nigerians should do at this point in time is to demand
accountability and transparency in the governance process,” an arrowhead of the
group said.
The second group in labour saw the acquiescence to a new pump
price as tantamount to “betrayal of the Nigerian people.” This group appeared to
have had the upper hand in the subsidy battle before the dramatic
capitulation.

 

Commendation, not condemnation
However, labour leaders,
who spoke with Saturday Sun on condition of anonymity, believed labour should be
commended rather than being condemned in the negotiation process. Said one of
the labour leaders: “We did the best we could. We are not politicians fighting
political causes. We always know when to stop.”


Photo: Sun News Publishing
More Stories on This Section

 

The battle over the removal of fuel subsidy, which raged for almost a week
all over the nation may, have come and gone, but the last is definitely yet to
be heard on the intrigues and the behind-the-scene manoeuvres that caused the
organised labour into beating a retreat and acquiescing to the Federal
Government’s position.

Saturday Sun exclusively gathered
that it was largely a case of emotional blackmail and outright threat of labour
leaders by the government.

“At some point in time, the sword of treason
hung delicately over the head of the labour negotiators, and being human, the
self-preservation instinct made them buckle,” said a dependable source, who
attended many of the meetings between both parties.

Another competent
source, who attended the meeting, told Saturday Sun how President Goodluck
Jonathan, at one of the sessions, pointedly accused labour of teeming with
disgruntled politicians and vocal civil society groups to bring down the
government. He also sought to appeal to emotions. The president reportedly
queried the labour team: “What have I done that you want to subvert my
government? Am I the only president that has increased the price of fuel? So,
why is my own case different? What is so different about my own case that you
insist that I must return to N65 a litre? I believe you are not being fair to
me?”

The president was not done. He also told labour that they were all
out to embarrass him because of his perceived weakness. He reportedly said:
“When (General Ibrahim) Babangida increased fuel price, he didn’t revert to the
price before increase; (Chief Olusegun) Obasanjo didn’t revert his price. Every
Nigerian head of state has increased fuel price and labour didn’t say revert to
the price it was or they would ground the nation; so why are you saying I must
revert to N65? Is it because I am simple and you are taking my simplicity for
weakness?”
The labour leaders were reportedly dumbfounded by the president’s
outburst. According to the source, when Jonathan offered N97 and went further to
make a veiled reference to treasonable offences, labour leaders knew they had
lost the steam to soldier on.

“Security agencies had obviously bugged
the lines of the top hierarchy of labour and were monitoring interaction between
the leadership of labour and people. Government provided security report, which
showed that the agenda of some of the organisers of the protest went beyond the
fight over removal of fuel subsidy to an outright call for regime change. That
was the last straw that broke labour’s back,” the source told Saturday
Sun.
Seeing they had lost in their original demand for a reversion to the
pre-January 1, 2012, old pump price, labour leaders then turned round to making
specific demands of the president: The complete cleaning of the petroleum
sector, including the octopus NNPC and drastic cut in the cost of governance,
among others. It is believed that labour’s input actually dictated the contents
of the president’s broadcast offering N97.

 

The Senate pressure
The Senate and its
leadership also put enormous pressures on the labour leadership. Senate
President, David Mark, was the arrowhead of the pressure group. As an
experienced power player, he glided smoothly from government to labour, trying
to ensure a delicate balance. Mark didn’t want government to lose face or for
labour to be humiliated. The compromise N97 new fuel price was largely due to
Mark and Senate’s interventionist role.

 

Governors Forum and others
The Nigeria
Governors’ Forum and two of its prominent leaders, Govs. Chibuike Amaechi and
Adams Oshiomhole, also worked assiduously in brokering a truce in the FG/Labour
spat. As a former labour leader, Oshiomhole is said to have worn two caps and
tried to balance both. While appealing to his colleagues to ‘cool temper,’ he
also sought to convince government why it should concede a reduction from the
increase of over 120 per cent.

 

Labour’s reaction
After the unveiling of new
price regime of N97 a litre, labour appeared to be torn apart, into two groups.
One group thought it was victory for organised labour in that they had secured a
reduction, while forcing presidential commitment to good and responsible
governance.
“What Nigerians should do at this point in time is to demand
accountability and transparency in the governance process,” an arrowhead of the
group said.
The second group in labour saw the acquiescence to a new pump
price as tantamount to “betrayal of the Nigerian people.” This group appeared to
have had the upper hand in the subsidy battle before the dramatic
capitulation.

 

Commendation, not condemnation
However, labour leaders,
who spoke with Saturday Sun on condition of anonymity, believed labour should be
commended rather than being condemned in the negotiation process. Said one of
the labour leaders: “We did the best we could. We are not politicians fighting
political causes. We always know when to stop.”

-Sun

 

Short URL: http://newnigerianpolitics.com/?p=17008

Posted by on Jan 21 2012. Filed under Latest Politics. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback to this entry

Leave a Reply

Okonjo-Iweala’s Brother, Ogwashi-Uku Monarch’s Convoy Attacked

Headlines

Ohanaeze Ndigbo demands apology, restitution from Bulkachuwa over alleged attack on Igbo

Categories

OPC to Fani Kayode: You are just a jobber lacking integrity

Browse Africa & World Politics

Featuring Top 3/2135 of Africa & World Politics

Browse National Politics

Featuring Top 5/1146 of National Politics

All eyes on INEC as Appeal Court upholds Oye, Soludo

Browse NNP Columnists

Featuring Top 10/1471 of NNP Columnists

Don’t vote for PDP, APC again; they have bad antecedents, former INEC Chairman, Prof. Attahiru Jega, warns Nigerians

Advertisements

--

FEATURED VIDEOS

Pastor Oyedepo sacks 40 plus pastors for failing to bring in sufficient offerings and tithe

ARCHIVES

January 2012
S M T W T F S
« Dec   Feb »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  

© 2021 New Nigerian Politics. All Rights Reserved. Log in - Designed by Gabfire Themes